Abstract

Background and Method   This study focused on American Sign Language (ASL) Interpreters, the main question being: Do interpreters prefer working onsite or remotely? The study employed a survey consisting of five categories of questions. The 24 question survey was constructed, posted,  and advertised to a network of ASL interpreters to form an understanding of their work experience and preferences. 

Limitations   Limitations include broad terminology, as well as a relatively small sample size with 66 survey respondents. In addition, not all respondents answered all 24 questions. 

Delimitations   A delimitation that was considered for this study was excluding Deaf Interpreters (DIs).  Another delimitation of this study was the limited survey advertising and posting. The survey was sent to a collective network of interpreters, encouraging them to share with their colleagues who would also be willing to participate. The survey was also posted to Facebook to reach interpreters who may not be in the established personal network. 

Results   While there are benefits and downsides to both onsite and remote interpreting, a majority of respondents indicate that the type of jobs they accept depend on the location. However, their preferences aren't dependent on whether it is onsite or remote. 

Conclusions   Considering preferences of interpreters is only part of why this research is important. Arguably more important is considering the preference of dDeaf consumers. Consumers lean towards a preference of onsite interpreting. This could be for a multitude of reasons including, but not limited to, personal connection, accessibility, and/or avoiding general technical interruptions.