In an America in which rights are constantly being lost, found, created, debated, granted, and withdrawn, it is necessary to evaluate the methods of determination and reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decisions that alter the livelihoods of its citizens. Abortion, a hotly contested right that has been stripped away from American women in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), provides an avenue of research ripe for an unrelenting analysis of judicial reasoning and constitutional interpretation. This thesis analyzes Justice Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs, focusing specifically on his assertion that a constitutional right must be “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition.” It critiques this standard and Alito’s attempt to demonstrate that abortion fails to meet this interpretation. Upon examination, Alito’s opinion uncovers selective historical interpretation, omission of evidence, and outcome-driven, inconsistent reasoning. By incorporating historical and constitutional research that Alito either overlooked or excluded, this thesis argues that abortion does, in fact, possess meaningful historical roots and constitutional support. Alito’s reasoning reflects alarming patterns of partisanship and agenda-based decision-making within a body entrusted with neutrality. Public trust in the judiciary is eroding rapidly; decisions that retract established positive rights while advancing a one-sided agenda intensify national frustration. If the Supreme Court is to remain a legitimate judicial body, its justices must be held accountable for accurate, scrupulous reasoning. Likewise, the American public must remain informed about the historical foundations of fundamental rights– rights that, as Dobbs demonstrates, can be suddenly revoked with serious consequences.
RELATED ABSTRACTS
Paris is often described as the world capital of secularism: the emblem of “laïcité” and constitutional religious neutrality. Yet this modern identity stands in tension with the city’s origins. The same skyline that now overlooks a secular republic was once shaped by sacred authority; its monarchy grounded legitimacy in theology, and its civic rhythms were ordered around Christian ritual. How did a city built upon the foundations of Western Christianity become the guardian of religious absence in public governance?
This project offers a cultural analysis of that transformation. Through literary examination of Parisian historical texts, architectural study of sacred landmarks such as Notre-Dame Cathedral, and analysis of modern French secular doctrine shaped in the aftermath of the French Revolution, I trace the Christian foundations that structured Paris’s political imagination and the revolutionary and intellectual forces that redefined it. Particular attention is given to the reconfiguration of authority: from sacred monarchy to constitutional secularism.
The irony is not contradiction but transformation. Paris’s secular present does not erase its Christian past; it emerges from it. To fully understand Contemporary Parisian culture and doctrine we must understand the rich history which led to where they are now today. In the tension between cathedral and constitution, the modern identity of Paris takes form.
RELATED ABSTRACTS
This project demonstrates that territorial Arizona was influenced by nationwide Progressive movements, through which the territory’s society developed progressive values that enabled Arizona to achieve statehood in 1912. While Arizona’s territorial history is portrayed in pop culture as a tale of the Wild West, this reputation did not last into statehood. Around the turn of the 20th century, Arizona became a relatively organized territory with an effective government and diverse, law-abiding citizens despite its notoriety for delinquency from just decades prior. This change occurred simultaneously as the nationwide shift into the Progressive Era, in which Americans campaigned for reforms such as labor regulations that were also popular in Arizona.
Despite the similar progressions of Arizona and American history during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, Arizona historiography frames the territory’s reform as isolated from progressive influences, and Progressive Era study overlooks Arizona, instead focusing on the American Northeast, Midwest, and California. This paper closes this gap in the historical record by analyzing the efforts of Arizona laborers, women, and settlers in local social movements, connecting Arizona’s reform to national Progressive Era movements. This essay then concludes that Arizona voters’ support for labor unions, women’s rights, and temperance as influenced by national movements and embodied in the 1910 Arizona Constitutional Convention and 1912 Constitution was integral to Arizona’s reform in character and governance.
RELATED ABSTRACTS
Bartolomeo de Las Casas, a 1500s Spanish Dominican friar and social reformer, led a one-man mission against the slavery of his time. Most scholarship revolving around Las Casas is incredibly polarized, viewing him as a reformed saint or as a colonizer hiding behind spiritual liberation. This presentation investigates Las Casas’s works and determines his motives. The goal is to see where he contradicted himself and consider how the audiences he addressed influenced or changed his perspective. In cross-examining his writings, (In Defense of the Indians published around 1550, A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies published in 1552, and History of the Indies published in 1561) contradictions abound, and this has led to diverse scholarly readings of Las Casas. The presentation exposes the flaws in the argument of Las Casas’s spiritual transformation (originating from Historian Lewis Hanke) while also questioning the claim that Las Casas was just another colonizer (originating from Professor Daniel Castro). This presentation is interested in examining Las Casas as a man who spread the message of abolitionism to anyone who would hear it, even if the facts had to be skewed to do so. Las Casas’s works are misrepresented depending on the perspective and history of whoever is examining them, leading to Las Casas's depictions across academia being skewed one way or another depending on the camp you fall into. This work attempts to focus n on who Las Casas was and if he was truly fighting Spanish bondage alone.
RELATED ABSTRACTS
The Dreyfus Affair, the wrongful conviction of French Jewish army officer Alfred Dreyfus for treason in 1894, is most often remembered as an example of antisemitism and a miscarriage of justice. What receives far less attention however is the role the Affair played in the secularization legislation that would sweep across France in the years to come.
This project argues that the group most responsible for enabling that legislation was the anti-Dreyfusards themselves, drawn overwhelmingly from Catholic institutions and organizations. French republican politicians had sought to reduce the Church's role in public life for decades but lacked the political conditions to do so. By committing themselves against Dreyfus, even after that position had been publicly disproven, Catholic institutions had discredited themselves more thoroughly than decades of republican anti-clerical arguments had managed to do beforehand. It was this continual overreach that handed anti-clerical politicians the mandate to finally make various secularization laws and acts of the early twentieth century possible, a phenomenon far from isolated to this single chapter of French history.
This project employs historical and legal analysis of primary sources, including parliamentary records and contemporary press, as well as drawing on works by historians Maurice Larkin, Ruth Harris, and John McManners. This case also illustrates a pattern visible well beyond France: from the collapse of Prohibition to the current backlash against the Trump administration's immigration enforcement, institutional overreach in moments of political crisis has repeatedly accelerated a movement's own disempowerment, handing opponents a mandate they could not have built alone.
Mark Moseley, the former professional placekicker who played for 4 teams over 16 seasons in the National Football League (NFL), certainly fits the mold of a story tailor-made for a Hollywood film. The purpose of this project is to examine the historical background of Moseley’s playing career to produce a screenplay for a biographical film focused upon the dramatic events of the 1982 NFL season. Utilizing archival research through newspaper and magazine articles, documentary and game footage, as well as sports record books, the research conducted will be converted into a screenplay that intends to depict both the highs and lows of Moseley’s career, while highlighting the 1982 season, which is similarly very intriguing. In this season, the NFL saw a player-strike, which shortened the year, helping to pave the way for Moseley to be named the League’s Most Valuable Player, helping his team, the Washington Redskins on their journey to become Super Bowl Champions. Never before in the history of the league had a placekicker been named Most Valuable Player, and it is more likely than not that it will never happen again, further proving that Moseley’s story as one befitting of historical research and a biographic film that will further exemplify his legacy entirely.