How Do Natural Marshes Differ from Living Shorelines?
For our research, we compared the characteristics of a constructed living shoreline and a natural, degrading shoreline at The Great Bay Reserve, NH. We investigated four characteristics for both; carbon content, grain size, foraminifera, and mineralogy. At the shorelines, we collected modern samples and sediment cores with Peat Corers from 3 different transects named A, B, and C. For modern samples, we took samples at 2 ft intervals starting from the upland and ending with the mudflat. After all samples were collected, we tested for the characteristics starting with carbon content by weighing each crucible, adding 1 cubic centimeter of sediment to each crucible, then reweighing them. Next, they were placed in an oven for 12 hours to dry, then burned at 550°C to remove all organic matter. To find grain size, our samples were first sieved, then put into a beaker with water. We used a BetterSizer machine to measure our samples and get the grain size. To find the foraminifera and mineralogy of our samples, we finely sieved our wet sample, then placed it in a flat plastic container with distilled water. Using the microscope, we counted all the forams and quartz per 0.2 cubic centimeter area. All non-quartz sand grains were considered “Lithics”. The results showed that natural marshes contain higher amounts of foraminifera, organic carbon, and a finer grain size than the restored marsh, possibly due to erosion over time. The natural marsh had a slightly higher fraction of organic matter, suggesting higher organic matter.
Research Area | Presenter | Title | Keywords |
---|